Jeep Sport Performance

Jeep Sport Cage, Suspension and Parts

Edge Products Air Intake Systems - Save 10% on th

Supercharged Jeep Wrangler against stock Jeep Wrangler

January 21st, 2010 by jeep

Here you can tell the difference between a supercharged jeep and a stock jeep. Mine is the gold jeep. Note that I had just installed the supercharger myself. No calibrations had been done and I was barely learning when to shift. Believe me, it does make a difference once you learn and do all that. If you turn on your speakers, you can listen to the supercharger, see the other race on my channel. THXS

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace

This entry was posted on Thursday, January 21st, 2010 at 9:08 pm and is filed under Wrangler Jeep. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.

25 responses about “Supercharged Jeep Wrangler against stock Jeep Wrangler”

  1. keithryan1025 said:

    wow thanks i had no idea

  2. rrpeters said:

    @keithryan1025 It is better on emissions. The 4.0L I6 was having trouble passing the newer emissions tests.

  3. buggar4466 said:

    cheaper format.

  4. patm249 said:

    im not talking about diesels jackass im talking about gasoline. my jeep had a straight six in it and i put the number 2 piston through the side of the block so i put a 400ci small block chevy in it and now it tops out at 140mph on 33in. m/t baja claws

  5. 86powerram said:

    @patm249 Then why is the strongest diesel made a I6?

  6. patm249 said:

    6 cylinders all suck get a v8

  7. eranohad said:

    the 3.8 engine is a V6 engine not stright 6

  8. weluvlabs said:

    Both the 4.0 and the 3.8 are good engines. I own a comanche with inline 6and a jk rubicon. Both put out amazing torque.
    both awsome on the trail, only those that do not own a jeep with a 3.8 feel they are inferior. you can’t really compare what you do not own.

  9. 4x4maniac89 said:

    I highly doubt it is, but it’s possible. The 4.0 in my 04 Wrangler gets somewhere in the area of 18 to 20 mpg sometimes if I drive like grandma. Not sure what the 3.8 gets

  10. keithryan1025 said:

    Is the 3.8 just better on gas is that why they made the switch?

  11. 4x4maniac89 said:

    Id assume these were both straight sixes. Jeep changed to the 3.8 in 07 when they switched to the JK wrangler. The 3.8 is inferior to the 4.0 in my opinion because the 4.0 makes more torque and hp at lower rpm which is more useable on the trail

  12. keithryan1025 said:

    the wrangles run a straight 6 all day the Rubicons were 4.0 straight six till i belive 06 than changed to a 3.8 straight six puttin out like 240 stok

  13. TJvigilante said:

    then you’re deaf. The higher-pitched whine the whole time was the supercharger. There was the lower tone exhaust from both jeeps, and the overtone of the supercharger. Anyone who has even seen a supercharger knows what they sound like.(twin screw or roots type…centrifugal type sounds like a turbo)

  14. 4x4maniac89 said:

    what engines to those jeeps have?

  15. krewchip said:

    It actually has a Borla exhaust. I don’t like the noise of flowmaster, to loud on the road.

  16. Chrismeister100 said:

    lol, they sounded like little RC cars. get some flowmaster exausts on them. driving in the sand looks fun btw

  17. krewchip said:

    It is an avenger supercharger.

  18. martinv6969 said:

    wut kind of supercharger are u running

  19. viperspider12 said:

    This is in San Luis Rio Colorado Sonora Mexico, well near it. Its in between the said city and El Golfo de Santa Clara Sonora. There is a patch of dunes in the desert. Just to give you an idea in relation to USA its on the Southwest corner of Arizona. OH, n mebo1990 and Jims7yfz450 it does have a supercharger on it but the engine wasn’t calibrated at that time, hence not the big difference.

  20. Jims07yfz450 said:

    nope sorry didn’t hear the SC.. Pic of it installed or it didn’t happen

  21. SuperDwang said:

    that is awesome

  22. mebo1990 said:

    i gotta be honest, i thought there wud be a bigger difference in speed

  23. JamesJK said:

    Where was this filmed?, Anyone know where to do this in Australia?

  24. Amras0407 said:

    It is pretty thin. The width is actually 7 inches, which is pretty thin (I’d really like to get some 9 or 10 inch wide wheels), but it functions.

  25. mcskatin said:

    that sounds way too thin